Propaganda is being
pushed at all of us—to do something about those damned guns. On
PBS, for instance, the true sponsors are people like the KOCH brothers and their
ilk belonging to the top richest 1% population. They’ve already damned near destroyed this
country by manipulating stock market regulations, first, and then with whatever
they did in crashing the stock markets once their lobbyists paid off Little
Bush. This isn’t paranoia—it’s right
there in the history of the media. I’ve
got that saved if anyone needs to see the realities of what has—and is—
happening to us.
The people who
are listening to (heeding) that propaganda are those--in my uneducated
ignorance—I call “Liberals”. What I mean
when I label people “Liberals” are those who make a judgment call by weighing the
veracity of whatever propaganda is
being pushed at them; who have no capacity to differentiate propagandized fantasy from the bleeding
reality of the “common man”—that’s you and me, by the way.
Simply put, “you
and me” have the most to lose if these rich assholes succeed in shoving their
own best interests down the majorities’ throats and calling it “reality”. Any
shooting—either ghetto gangster or the
children of the educated middle class (mostly white) parents—is, of course,
undesirable.
In the case of
the Connecticut shooting, it becomes impossible to fight against the current propaganda
being used to sway the majority towards emasculating The Second Amendment by
saying anything that goes contrary to that rich-1%-financed-reporting and
opinionating, else one appears ignorant, unfeeling—and in actuality—one is
standing with nothing to offer that doesn’t appear ignorant, unfeeling, blood-thirsty, or gun-nutish.
Etcetera.
A real and true
Fucked-If-You-Do-Fucked-If-You-Don’t situation.
Being an old white
cynic raised in Jim Crow south, I have to think that if the Connecticut school
shooting had happened in Detroit, for instance, in a predominately black
elementary school, would we be enduring so much reporting on the aftermath? Would that event have precipitated,
potentially, an unalterable change in the fabric of our country?
The
Constitution of the United States of America and 10 original amendments to The
Constitution of the United States of America—The Bill of Rights—states in The
Second Amendment:
Amendment II
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a
free State, the right
of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Our folks who
wrote our first documents must have known that the most important words were NECESSARY TO THE
SECURITY OF A FREE STATE
And FREEDOM at ANY cost is the most important concept any of us can dredge up to
fight the well-thought-out and deliberate attempts by the richest 1% to
gradually and inexorably bring us to our knees, to enslave us, to continue
their march toward Social Darwinism as if they have the right to
do so. (Not the first time in our history this was
tried—look it up.)
They do not
have that right. Their wealth does not
give them the right to enslave Americans.
Their wealth does not give them the right to use any means necessary to
march the rest of us towards poverty and eventually enslavement, destitution, hunger, and
the decline of a population worked to death with no hope of ever getting enough
sustenance to support a better life.
So, because the
rich own the media, they've made the issue about guns rather than about freedom.
But this is about nothing more and nothing
less than freedom from tyranny—the very issue that caused the writers of The
Constitution and The Bill of Rights to chose the words they wrote down for us.
Of course we
won’t give up our guns—but they will
take them from our “cold, dead hands” and continue to enslave us if they are
allowed to continue their ownership of all media, which is being used to force
feed us their propaganda. (another
so-called ‘benefit’ of de-regulation)
What I say to
that is an old graffiti from the Sixties:
EAT THE RICH.
I understand those
words now.
You understand this one:
Prepare.
